Structural Analysis and Calculations
Related to the Tower of Pisa





 



Work by Vittorio Novelli, a surveyor from Cesena (Forlì) 





Tower of Pisa





STATIC CALCULATIONS







1st phase: Anchorage of the Tower by means of steel cables





1) Sizing of the cables:

The sizing of the cables, their number and their position, have been

individually selected to satisfy the following conditions:



a) to make a uniform ground pressure;



b) to stress for size, the different "orders" of rings, in a uniform 

   way and in terms that are most acceptable.



The first condition is satisfied when the sum of the moments of

all the tension applied to the bands, relative to the center of 

the base equal the given moment resulting from the weight of the 

Tower for its eccentricity on the base.  The second condition is 

satisfied when the tension applied to the bands result in a load 

proportional to the weights of each single respective ring.



It is stable when each section balances in compression and turnover.



Calculated data is taken or inferred from the publication 

"Searches and Studies on the Leaning Tower of Pisa", 1971, from 

the Office of the Public Jobs.  It is summarized as follows:





- inclination of the plane of support of the Tower on the ground: 

  5°35'53" (equal to 5.5980° degrees; 0.097704 radians);



- partial and progressive mass of each order:



                             Partial    Progressive



           8th order           725t          725t

           7th order         1,267t        1,992t

           6th order         1,175t        3,167t

           5th order         1,192t        4,359t

           4th order         1,227t        5,586t

           3rd order         1,362t        6,948t

           2nd order         1,371t        8,319t

           1st order         3,738t       12,057t

          at the base        2,396t       14,453t



  (In the calculations that follow, at the 6th order, a partial 

  and progressive mass equal to 3,167 tons will be attributed, 

  not being the two greatest orders of interest in this same 

  calculation);



- eccentricity of base (looking along a section normal 

  to the Tower): 2.24 m.





The position of the characteristic points (Center of Gravity and 

centers of the rings) and the dimensions of the structure 

(diameters, heights and thickness) are taken again from the 

quoted ministerial publication.



How the project data is assembled:



- the position of the center of gravity of each band of cable is 

  at the point of detachment from the Tower (point of tangency) 

  and vertically in the center of the respective order. Said 

  band is in such position that the first band from the top is 

  respectively the 6th order; the second, the 5th order; the third, 

  the 4th order; the fourth, the 3rd order; and the fifth, 

  the 2nd order;



- Cables are embedded in an external anchorage plinth of concrete 

  set 90m from the center of the Tower in which is embeddedd 

  an axle (corresponding to the direction of the plane of maximum 

  inclination) with the points of attachment of the cabless varying, 

  with respect to the level of the base, from 16.75m to 14.25m.



The calculation of the cables presupposes the use of cables of 

braided steel of the type SEALE WORRINGTON, 222 THREADS, diameter 

of 24 mm (15/16 inch) whose nominal characteristics are:



       weight 2.40 Kg/ m

       diameter of the individual threads 1.33 mm

       Tensile load guaranteed  - minimum 38,400 Kg

       resistance 180 Kg/ [mm²] (1770 N/ [mm²])

       extension at design load - 2% length (around)



A prudent safety measure restrains the cables to not more than the 

50% of their nominal load and therefore with a maximum load of 

19.2 Kg each.



The first analysis and the first trial could be made on the tension 

and compression on the ground and on the masonry, not forgetting 

that the data furnished would mirror transitory conditions and that 

they will stop with the stop of the tension of the cables.  They 

are, in substance, the conditions in which one will find the Tower 

at the moment of the execution of the work.



                                 

         reduction               terrestrial             masonry

         inclination             s.max|s.min            s.max|s.min

                                   (kg/cm²)               (kg/cm²)



           0°                    5.14   5.14            1.00   8.59

           1°                    5.13   5.13           10.85   8.63

           1° 30'               5.12   5.12           10.77   8.65

           2°                    5.11   5.11           10.70   8.67

Scheme of positioning anchorage cables


These meaningful data, that alone describe the angle of elevation for stability of the anchored Tower, coordinate with these other statistical characteristics: - eccentricity of void base (and= 0), in all cases; - maximum eccentricity of 32 cm in the 6° ring; - solicitation to the cut that doesn't overcome the 0.24 Kg/cm²; - coefficient of inferior attrition of 0.027 (corresponding to an inclination of the resultant of 1°32'); - traction in the inferior cables to 8,900 Kg/ [cm²] (against the 18,000 nominal); A true and accurate understanding of the conditions of the Tower is needed in this delicate phase of removal of the underlying ground and of the sucessive consolidation of the foundation plinth. 2) Verification of stability of the structures of anchorage of the cables: Volume and mass of the reinforced concrete and its ballast. a) Caisson in reinforced concrete n. length width height volume unit mass mass total eccent (m) (m) (m) (cu.m.) (tons/cu.m) (tons) (m) 1 20.00 10.00 2.00 400.000 3 20.00 0.80 11.00 528.000 8 0.80 3.80 11.00 267.000 1 20.00 10.00 0.80 160.000 6 5.60 3.80 0.80 102.144 1457.664 2.500 3644.16 0.00 b) Spurs in reinforced concrete n. length width height volume unit mass mass total eccent (m) (m) (m) (cu.m.) tons/cu.m (tons) (m) 1 20.00 2.00 2.00 80.000 2.500 200.00 5.00 4 0.80/2 2.00 11.80 37.760 2.500 94.40 4.67 c) Central Void in reinforced concrete (by deduction) n. length width height volume unit mass mass total eccent (m) (m) (m) (cu.m.) tons/cu.m (tons) (m) 1 3.80 5.60 0.80 17.024 2.500 42.56 2.30 d) ballast in inert material n. length width height volume unit mass mass total eccent (m) (m) (m) (cu.m.) tons/cu.m (tons) (m) 12 3.80 5.60 5.10 1302.336 1.700 2213.97 0.00 e) empty ballast (by deduction) n. length width height volume unit mass mass total eccent (m) (m) (m) (cu.m.) tons/cu.m (tons) (m) 2 3.80 5.60 5.10 217.056 1.700 369.00 2.30 Gravitational Center of the total mass [ Image] [ Image] and therefore 6.863 m from the point of the overturning
Plinth for anchorage extracts


Resistant moment to overturning: Mres= 5740.97 x 6.863= 39400 ton-meters Tension transmitted from the cables to C, the center of the plinth, in the more unfavorable hypothesis: Moment = - 16,699 ton-meters (with the horizontal component 15.96 m from the theoretical center of the plinth) Normal effort (toward the top)= 168 t Axial effort (horizontal)= 1046 t Moment transported to the point of tangency (7 m. toward the Tower and 0.80 toward the lower part): M=- 16699- 1046 x 0,80- 168 x 7,00=- 18703 ton-meters degree of stability to the tangency: [ Image] Position of the resultant as regards the point of turnover: [ Image] (therefore with an eccentricity of 2.29 m). Bearing on the ground: a) excluding the resistance to traction: [ Image] b) admitting the resistance to traction of the poles: [ Image] smax (compression)= 2.32 + 2.74 = 5.06 kg/cm² smax (traction)= 2.32 - 2.74 = 0.42 kg/cm² with the point of flex 0.92 m from the tension edge. To guarantee the traction on the ground, whose intensity has given from: N'= ½ (20.00 m x 0.92 m x 4.2 t/m²) = 38.64 t 20 piles with resistance by friction of 2 tons are foreseen each reinforced with 4 or 14 (6,16 cm²). [ Image] that, obviously, is a limit of total safety. In the compressed zone are installed cast in place concrete piles for a total load data taken from: N'= ½ (20,00 x11,08 x 51.6 t/m²)= 11435 t 200 piles will be installed, therefore, with load of 58 t each, obviously, one will provide for the yielding of the ground to reach, in the extreme, a resistance to compression of 5.16 kg/cm². 2nd phase: amplification of the foundation Dimensions of the structure of reinforcement: width of the circular crown about the base: 4 m external height of the crown: 1.5 m inside height (that is in contact with the existing foundation) 3 m diameter of the central nucleus 4.5 m height of the central nucleus 3 m weight of all the additional complex 1818 t height of the center of gravity (on the plan of the base) 1.23 m Since the additional plinth influences only the base of the Tower, in the sense that the structure standing above is not influenced, from the static point of view, by the new strength agent (weight of the plinth) the new response of the base is determined, that is as it concerns the unloaded Tower, by the action of the cables, but with reduced inclination, respectively of 1°, of 1.5° and 2° as regards the current one. Reduction of the inclination to 1°: Moment (M) -26,700.35 - 1818 x tan 0.080709 = - 26,847.4 ton-meters Normal effort (N) -14.406 - 1818 x cos 0.080709 = - 16,218 tons Eccentricity of base (e) M/N = 1.66 meters Tangential Force (T) -1165 - 1818 x sen 0.080709 = - 1,312 tons Area 1/4 * pi * (27.58)^2 = 597.42 m^2 Modulus of resistance (W) 1/32 * pi * 27.58^3 = 2.059.6 m^3 Tension to compression smax = 4.02 kg/cm2 smin = 1.41 kg/cm2 Tension at the split t = 0.22 kg/cm2 Reduction of the inclination to 1° 30': Moment (M) -23,857.79 - 1818 x tan 0.071982 = - 23,988.9 ton-meters Normal effort (N) -14.416 - 1818 x cos 0.071982 = - 16,229 tons Eccentricity of base (e) M/N = 1.48 meters Tangential Force (T) -1039 - 1818 x sen 0.080709 = - 1,170 tons Area 1/4* pi * D^2 = 597.42 m^2 Modulus of resistance (W) 1/32* pi * D^3 = 2,059.6 m^3 Tension to compression smax = 3.88 kg/cm2 smin = 1.55 kg/cm2 Tension at the split t = 0.20 kg/cm2 Reduction of the inclination to 2°: Moment (M) -21,013.41 - 1818 x tan 0.063255 = - 21,128.6 ton-meters Normal effort (N) -14.424 - 1818 x cos 0.063255 = - 16,238 tons Eccentricity of base (e) M/N = 1.41 meters Tangential Force (T) -914 - 1818 x sen 0.063255 = - 1,029 tons Area 1/4* pi * 27.58 ^ 2 = 597.42 m^2 Modulus of resistance (W) 1/32* pi * 27.58 ^ 3 = 2,059.6 m^3 Tension to compression smax = 3.74 kg/cm2 smin = 1.69 kg/cm2 Tension at the split t = 0.17 kg/cm2
Solicitations on the ground transmitted from the foundations


Complete solidarity between the existing structure and the supporting one is insured by the application of 18 post-tension cables of the DYFORM type 6 x 36mm to 38mm (nominal tensile capacity of 118 tons) with applied tension equal to 70 tons.
View Together


Plan of intervention elaborated by Vittorio Novelli, Nazzareno Paccaloni, Marco Crescentini, George Crescentini which application of the brief industrial No. 12001A/90 titled "Procedure to correct the tilt of towers and buildings generally" by Vittorio Novelli ...



Translated by Gary Feuerstein, 25 March 1998, with permission from Mr. Novelli




Return to GF Building Homepage
Return to GF Homepage
Return to GF Leaning Tower of Pisa Page


Personal e-mail to:

gary@endex.com